- Home
- What is it?
- The history of archaeology
- Bad data
- Bad Archaeology’s special data set
- Exotic places
- Out-of-place artefacts
- Anomalous human remains
- Footprints and the like
- Anomalously old technology
- Mysterious objects
- Very ancient artefacts
- The Nampa figurine
- A ‘carved’ fossil shell?
- Letters inside marble?
- A chalk ball from Laon
- A mortar & pestle from Tuolomne
- Sling stone from the Red Crag
- Metallic tubes from St-Jean-de-Livet
- A ‘crystal lens’ from…
- Gold thread from Rutherford Mill (UK)
- Gold chain from Morrisonville, Illinois
- Carved stone from Lehigh, Iowa
- Iron cup from Wilburton, Oklahoma
- Hieroglyphs in a coal mine at…
- Nail in sandstone from Kingoodie (UK)
- Metallic vase from Dorchester,…
- A medallion from Lawn Ridge, Illinois
- An iron nail in Californian quartz
- An iron object in Scottish coal
- Tools in rock at Aix-en-Provence
- Eoliths: tools or naturally fractured…
- The ‘London hammer’ (Texas)
- Petroglyphs, inscriptions and reliefs
- Unusual structures
- Old maps
- Religious texts
- Conspiracy theories
- Lost civilisations
- Extraterrestrials
- Other chronologies
- Controversies
- Other dimensions?
- Religious delusions
- Frauds and hoaxes
- In the service of politics
- Dubious methodologies
- Explanations
- Reference material
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Links
- Contact the authors
Frauds and hoaxes
While some discoveries remain controversial because the suspicion of fraud has been raised, others are clearly hoaxes. Many are malicious or done with the intent of enhancing the discoverer’s reputation: a good example of the latter is provided by the career of Charles Dawson (1864-1916), who was not only ‘discoverer’ of Piltdown Man, the well-known fossil fraud, but also of numerous objects, including stamped ‘Roman tiles’, iron figurines and much more.
In this section, we look at some of the more egregious examples of archaeological fraud as well as some lesser-known instances.