Gold chain from Morrisonville, Illinois

On 9 June 1891, Nina Maxon Culp from Morrisonville (Illinois, USA) (usually referred to as Mrs Silas W Culp as this is how she was named in The Morrisonville Times report of 11 June that forms the basis of every published account) found a small gold chain apparently embedded in a lump of coal she had just broken apart. It was said to be about ten inches (254 mm) long and weighed 8 pwt (12.4 g), while the quality of the gold was assessed as eight carats. The chain occupied a circular hollow in the coal and both ends, which were placed close together, were contained inside the lump. It was believed that the source of the coal was the Taylorville or Pana mines, also in Illinois.

It may be mere coincidence that Mrs Culp’s husband, Silas, was proprietor of The Morrisonville Times from 1887 and also the town’s jeweller from 1889. On the other hand, local newspapers in the late nineteenth-century USA were not well known for the quality of their journalism and are known to have perpetrated hoaxes (such as the hoaxed ‘mystery airship’ crash of 19 April 1897 at Aurora (Texas, USA), reported in local newspapers). Like the Aurora ‘mystery airship’ crash, there is now no physical evidence to examine, just the newspaper report.

8 Replies to “Gold chain from Morrisonville, Illinois”

  1. I’m not making any claims about authenticity, however, I did see a coal embedded gold chain on display in a glass case at Bob Jones University in the mid ’80’s in their science building. both ends were clearly still embedded in separate halves of a broken chunk of coal. The links were small and turned so that the chain could lay flat. I do not know if this would be the same chain. I have not been able to track it’s current location.

  2. That’s it? All you have?
    Anecdotal evidence that some American newspapers were bad does not equate to all American newspapers were bad. Where is the analysis of this artifact or alleged artifact?

    1. But that’t the heart of the problem: no-one has ever seen the chain! And why do you think that the newspaper chose not to reveal that the alleged finder was the wife of the paper’s owner? I smell something, and it’t not nice.
      So, I throw your comment back at you: that’s it? All you have? Just an old newspaper report.

  3. Evidence such as that once displayed at Bob Jones University tends to disappear from public gaze. Quite a few collections have been removed from museums and put into storage because they called into question the prevailing scientific views. Micheal Cremo’s seminal work Extreme Human Antiquity is a good starting point for folks to begin to wake up.

    1. Michael Cremo’s work is based around using old reports of discoveries whose age was unknown. As I get tired of pointing out, if a palaeoanthropologist discovers a hominin fossil that pushes the date for the emergence of our species farther back in time, then s/he publishes it. There is no scientific high priesthood that removes these things from public gaze and sequesters them in dusty stores: that’s the way religion behaves.

  4. What is your source for the name “Nina Maxon Culp”? I’ve seen the newspaper accounts; where did you find this detail that differs?

Agree or disagree? Please comment! If you've never commented before, you may have to wait until I approve it: please be patient.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: