Sling stone from the Red Crag

The "sling stone" from Bramford (Suffolk, England)
The “sling stone” from Bramford (Suffolk, England) (photograph from Man 29)

In 1926, John Baxter, one of the quarrymen who regularly supplied Ipswich archaeologist James Reid Moir (1879-1944) with interesting discoveries, uncovered a particularly unusual egg-shaped object from below the Red Crag deposits at Bramford (Suffolk, England). He is usually described by Bad Archaeologists as Reid Moir’s “assistant”, but in Moir’s publications he is consistently referred to as a “quarryman” or “trained excavator”. Reid Moir was a passionate believer in eoliths, supposedly extremely ancient stone artefacts (he termed them pre-Palaeolithic!), and was convinced that numerous artefacts could be found in these Tertiary deposits.

Nevertheless, he seems to have paid this object little attention and it was not until a visit by Abbé Henri Breuil (1877-1961) in 1929 that his attention was drawn to it by his visitor. After examining the object with a hand lens, Breuil became convinced that striations on it were evidence for its manufacture, believing it to be comparable with New Caledonian sling-stones.

The photograph (published by Reid Moir in Man 29), is too poor to make out any but the most obvious striations on the surface of the object. It has to be said that they do not look much like the marks of shaping, but as Abbé Breuil examined the object at first hand and was convinced that they were artficial, his authority must carry great weight. However, such striations are well known on stones and boulders moved by glacial or water action. As the Red Crag deposits date from the Gelasian chrono-stratigraphic phase, 2,588,000 to 1,806,000 years ago during the earliest phase of the Lower Pleistocene, when this part of Britain was under a shallow sea, and it seems most likely that the “sling-stone” is a simple case of misidentification, its natural grooves being mistaken for human manufacture by an expert who was overtaken by his colleague’s enthusiasm for finding objects in the deposit in question.

3 Replies to “Sling stone from the Red Crag”

  1. If I wanted to be a badarchaeologist and make a few quid on ebay I can step outside and find dozens of highly plausable “slingstones ” in any of the surrounding fields or if I were to be really naughty from the material which makes up the 11C Motte in town….glacial and ancient lake deposits make some weird ar**d shapes and markings that are still catching me out so unless I found one preserved in a leather slung in the peat or an obviously piled *hoard* of them they are simply stones,whether at one point in our rather extensive history someone has happened to pick up one of those stones and use it in a sling is left for idle speculation if im in a particularly sparse field :)

  2. Where is the stone nowadays? And did anyone else examine it after Abbé Breuil? If so, what did they conclude?

    1. I’m not aware of anyone examining the stone since Breuil. It’s not uncommon for glacial erratics to have parallel grooves on them (they are sometimes referred to as “tracked stones”). As the Red Crags is a glacially derived deposit, this seems to me to be the most likely explanation for this stone.

Agree or disagree? Please comment! If you've never commented before, you may have to wait until I approve it: please be patient.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: