Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 166 other subscribers

EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish

A photograph alleged to show one of the ‘Dropa stones’

A photograph alleged to show one of the ‘Dropa stones’

A number of publications, particularly on the Ancient Astronaut end of the Bad Archaeology scale, have repeated a story about some stones said to have been found in caves at Bayan Kara Ula in western China. The story became known in the west principally through Erich von Däniken’s second and third books, Return to the Stars and Gold of the Gods, although it appeared first in Robert Charroux’s work and has since become a staple of ufological literature.

The Bayan Kara Ula (Bayan Kara Shan or Bayan Har Shan) region (around 97°E 34°N), in Qinghai (Tsinghai) and Sichuan Provinces, contains the sources of the Tontian He (Yangtse Kiang) and Za Qu (Mekong) Rivers and until relatively recently, it was very isolated. In January 1938, according to the story, Chu Pu Tei (since 2009, a Chinese version of the name – 齐福泰, Qi Futai or Qifu Tai – has been in circulation), a Chinese archaeologist, made a remarkable discovery in caves in the region. The caves contained a series of graves, while their walls were decorated with drawings of people with elongated heads together with images of the sun, moon and stars. The graves were found to contain the remains of beings little more than a metre tall, with abnormally large skulls. The archaeologists also found a stone disk a little over 300 mm in diameter, with a hole in the centre. A groove on the surface of the disk spiralled outwards from the centre hole to the rim and back, forming a double spiral. Another 716 disks were found in the caves by subsequent investigations.

The disks were sent to a variety of scholars for investigation. One of them, Professor Tsum Um Nui of the Beijing Academy for Ancient Studies, found that the spiral grooves were actually a line of characters written in an unknown language. In 1962, he announced that he had managed to translate the disks. According to his translation, an alien spacecraft crashed in the Bayan Har Shan region twelve thousand years ago. The occupants, aliens called Dropa or Dzopa, could not repair their craft and tried to adapt to conditions on Earth. Meanwhile, the local Ham (or Kam or Kham, depending on the source) tribesmen hunted down and killed most of them. As the Ham were notably short people themselves, it is not clear whether the skeletons found in the caves were those of the Dropa/Dzopa or of Ham tribesmen. Supposedly, the aliens had intermarried with the locals, making identification of the origins of the skeletons more difficult.

The Professor’s publication of his results was greeted with disbelief and he was branded a liar. Resigning from Beijing Academy, he emigrated to Japan, where he died shortly afterwards. Nevertheless, Russian scientists became interested in the disks; several were sent to Moscow, where a chemical analysis found that the disks contained large amounts of cobalt.

One of ‘Wegener/Wegerer’s’ polaroids of two of the Dropa stones

One of ‘Wegener/Wegerer’s’ polaroids of two of the Dropa stones

In 1974, Ernst Wegener (or Wegerer according to some versions), an Austrian engineer, located two of the disks in the Banpo Museum (Banpo Bowuguan) in Xi’an, Shaanxi Province. The museum director could tell him nothing about the disks, which had begun to deteriorate, but she allowed him to photograph them. By 1994, the disks had disappeared and, it is alleged, the previous curator had also disappeared. Banpo is best known for its Neolithic (Yangshao Culture) village, located about nine kilometres from the centre of Xi’an on the bank of the River Chanhe; the museum is built on the site of the village and is dedicated to objects excavated from it.

Although the story is rich in circumstantial detail, unlike so many in the Bad Archaeological literature, the earliest source for it is in a 1960 article “Were Alien Visitors on Earth?” in the magazine Новое Русское Слово (Russian Digest, by V Ritch and M Chernenko. It was later condensed by Vyacheslav Zaitsev in the English language magazine Sputnik: the Russian Digest dating from 1967, where it was called ‘Visitors from outer space: science versus fiction’. Intriguingly, this contained the story before the alleged date of Tsum Um Nui’s translation of the disks as related in later accounts. Russian Digest is a sensationalistic magazine similar to Britain’s Daily Sport and the USA’s National Inquirer and the only other sources – a Belgian UFO magazine, a German vegetarian magazine (Das Vegetarische Universum), which published a paper allegedly by Chu Pu Tei called ‘Groove writing relating to spaceships’, and a Russian science-fiction magazine – simply repeat the original 1960 story, with no additional information.

Tibetan nomadic herders, known as dropka

Tibetan nomadic herders, known as dropka

The Dropa turn out not to be the descendants of aliens, even mixed-race descendants, but an indigenous people of the eastern Tibetan plateau. Their name – which is better rendered Drop-Ka under the Gould-Parkinson system of transliteration for Tibetan – means ‘solitude’ or ‘inhabitant of high pasture lands’, a thoroughly down-to-earth description of semi-nomadic tribespeople of the plateau.

Worse, none of the names given in the accounts belongs to anyone who can be shown to have been involved archaeology or linguistics. Tsum Um Nui does not even appear to be a genuine Chinese name! There has never been a Beijing Academy for Ancient Studies and there are no records of an archaeologist named Chu Pu Tei: all stories with this name or its recent alternative spelling of Qi Futai relate to the Dropa Stones. The photos attributed to the otherwise unknown Wegener appear to be genuine, but they merely show stone disks with a hole in the centre and double spirals that were part of ancient snake cults and are known as Bi discs. One of the photographs of an alleged disk – not Wegener’s – shows it propped on a chair, clearly with a diameter much larger than the 300 mm claimed by the story. There is no mystery about a curator no longer being in post after twenty years: even museum professionals are permitted to change jobs, retire and die. In short, the details permit us to dismiss the story as science fiction.

44 Responses to The Dropa (or Dzopa) stones

  • Pingback: Why are the “Dropa Stones” the most searched for subject on Bad Archaeology? « Bad Archaeology

  • Pingback: Unexplained by sarahturton - Pearltrees

  • Tom says:

    Just had a dream about stones much smaller than the ones in the picture woke up and couldnt get the word droopa out of my head … my google search lead me here … I had a dream I was collecting them. However I do watch alot of dragonball z … coincedence?

  • Subhadip Pal says:

    Just want to ask a simple thing why there are so many dropa discs? why are they round in shape made out of rock or clay with a particular hole in it? nothing can be out of purpose right. So, the ancient chinese tribe people are constructing some artifact whose known use is not known to us, how is that possible ?
    Other OOPart like AntiKythera Mechanism is still a unknown and undeniable mystery object

  • Grant says:

    Who is the person who wrote this piece?! “Bad Archaeology”? This is a term that is used by writers like yourself who have no previous knowledge of either the anient astronaut theory or archeology in general. This “bad Archaeology” is what my collegues and fellow scholars have been researching for the past 20 years. Do you have any idea how much archaeological artifacts have been found in the past 30 – 40 years that give direct evidence to this super-plausable history? The answer is No, you dont have any idea. If you did you would not be able to bring yourself to write “Bad Archaeology” in regards to this topic, No matter how much your paid to write this stuff!.
    I’ll say the same as i stress to writers as close minded as yourself. Before you write about a topic and pass judgement, make sure you have the research and evidence to back that kind of judgement up.
    If you have no knowledge of something dont make judgement on it.

    • Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews says:

      I’m the person who wrote this piece. I’m a professional archaeologist with more than 26 experience in the field. Don’t insult my intelligence with your poorly written ramblings. Unlike you, I do my research before writing and passing judgement; I produce evidence to back it up. All you can do is make unsupported statements that are nonsensical.

      • Robert says:

        Mr Fitzpatrick-Matthews is correct: while he laid out examples, counter-examples, and an analysis, all we get from Mr. Grant is a bit of Argumentum Ad Hominem. Thank you Mr. Grant. You are a good and funny person, but you will have to improve your trolling skills.

  • Grant says:

    You guys aint real archaeologists!! no way could you have this view of archaeology and be keen archaeologists. To hell with yor Pompeii and roman history. The true history is of the Sumerian Civilization, this archaeology at its finest, maybe you guys havent been very far in life but arhaeology has so much more to offer than subjective cultures of roman history and politics. The real archaeollogy has in the last 20 years been in the middle east and south america. There have been findings in South america and Iran that you have no idea about, that would scare you to your witts. Even an old man like myself with 20+ years experience in the middle east were shocked with the findings. As far as i am told these findings will be provided to public opinion towards end of the year. After that happens theres really no future for this site…. sorry :)

    • Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews says:

      On the contrary, we are both real archaeologists and it appears that you have been taken in by fraudsters.

    • Scott Hamilton says:

      I’ll put “towards the end of the year” on my calendar. And of course, Grant, when December 31, 2012 comes and no evidence has been presented you’ll come back here and apologize for lying, right?

    • rayvonchong says:

      Precisely which year are you referring to? Plainly wasn’t 2012 – can you narrow it down any further?

  • Subhadip Pal says:

    Criticizing each others is not the correct way of accepting knowledge though it has happened in our past and present and will happen in future. I would like to give preference to knowledge. Dropa stones, the sacura bird, the mayan golden flyer, antikythera mechanism etc are many things which are stunning pieces of evidence that people in the past had tremendous knowledge. Which was lost in the course or history. People just admitted many fact in the name of religion and faith without questioning. Are there any known facts which are hidden from us by our leaders? My point is why are we not seeing things with an open mind?

  • Charlotte says:

    Is it frustrating knowing that facts mean very little when the public will believe anyone who can publish a book? (Of course, anyone can publish a book when the public will believe anyone…hm…chicken or egg?)

    Does it ever make you wonder, knowing that anyone can say anything…how much of your own knowledge may be incorrect, or based on shoddy research? I mean, you can’t see with your own eyes every artifact that you proclaim to know about, or even if you could, you’d still be relying on another archeologist’s interpretation of the findings…do you *really* do independent research on *every* single thing you blog about here? This isn’t even a question of your ability and experience. I’m just wondering if there have ever been complete charlatans exposed to be part of the “academic” archaeological community.

    Sorry, just playing Devil’s advocate here (actually, your responses to the rude, barely-literate Grant are hilarious). I’ve been a hardcore rationalist most of my life, but some philosophy courses confused me, so now I’m the very model of a post-college spiritual-truth seeker…all of this sort of thing seems to just flow along with it. One of my friends just told me about Dropa stones as well as the Grooved Spheres and supposed Ancient Mayan Aircraft…I suppose I’m in the right place. :)

    • Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews says:

      Charlotte

      I can’t, as you say, examine every artefact or every site I mention here. I tend to deal with those for which I have some wider background knowledge, for which I have access to publications dealing with the material in question and in which I am interested. The Dropa Stones interest me because I am also interested in UFOs.

      And yes, there have been complete charlatans within the academic archaeological community. There have also been respectable archaeologists who have massaged their data to make it fit with their own preconceived ideas. Then there are archaeologists who write reports that have had elements removed because they are inconvenient or uncongenial to the person commissioning the report (and I know, because it happened to me when I excavated an obvious fairy ring in a garden that had been claimed to be the cropmark of an Iron Age round house: I was not allowed to call it a fairy ring and had to conclude that it was an unknown but probably archaeological feature. I now wish I’d stood up to my manager!).

      • Veej says:

        I’ve just stumbled onto this conversation due to researching these “dropa stones”….I can’t form an opinion one way or the other at this point but what brought me here was a youtube video :

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlQkAFtJnYw&feature=player_embedded

        I found it very interesting and wonder if you can comment on what is presented there? I’m just an everyday person with a lot of curiosity….
        Great back and forth conversation on this particular string.

  • Sean says:

    Not to rekindle any flames here, but I really would like to see a link to these findings you speak of Grant. Maybe a link of your webpage or to some of your work to lend credibility to your complaints about the author here. With all due respect, your comments do seem to be more reminiscent of a casual reader who found something they disagree with than those of a professional. A true expert in any field would not have unleashed the barbed comments you have.

    So again, I ask that you provide a bit of documentation for your claims; the author of this article clearly knows a bit on this subject and doesn’t deserve unwarranted negativity.

  • ix09 says:

    Kudos and Thumbs up to Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews.
    I’ve heard about this ‘case’ on and off for years, and doing a revisit to it brought me here.
    Excellent information.
    Without source material, verification, or any hard physical anything to poke at there’s nothing.
    Too often now, too many are letting Youtube, and every other hack speculation site tell them what to think and believe.
    While some of these hack sites may show some interesting ‘evidence’ toward whatever speculation, speculation is just that.

  • robert says:

    archaeologists remind me of most current doctors ( I AM one)…they are so sure and smug about the “current truth”, only to have future generations of their profession laughing at their theories….too many researchers and physicians don’t even know they’re IN the box, let alone thing outside of it.

    • Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews says:

      You seem very cynical about “current truth”. Surely, it’s an accepted part of science that “current truth” is contingent, not fixed in stone and will be self-correcting. The parts that are wrong will be discarded and replaced by better ideas. That’s the way science works.

      I could look back and mock the fact that my predecessor at work in the 1930s thought that Iron Age grain storage pits were actually dwellings, but it would be an inappropriate response. A better way is to understand exactly why he thought they were dwellings and why I think they are grain storage pits. This is why archaeology – like other sciences – is now more aware of the theoretical underpinnings of interpretations.

      I hope you can see why “current truth” is only temporary. It’s the best we’ve got. As soon as something better comes along, it will replace the incorrect elements. It, too, will be only temporary. That’s called progress and it’s quite inappropriate to laugh at the ideas of earlier generations. What I do find risible, though, is when people today resurrect old, discredited ideas and present them as new, ground-breaking interpretations.

      • Philip Louis Phillips says:

        Your patient responses to the apparently illiterate as well as the self-proclaimed experts are definitely very professional. I am always impressed with your articles and blog. And your answer here to the good Doctor is cogent. If he is a medical Doctor, I hope to never walk into his examining room if that is his attitude toward current knowledge.
        Again thanks for this great site.

  • Scott says:

    I’d never heard of the “Dropa Stones” until this morning, and what I find more interesting is how they, along with so many other ancient astronaut/conspiracy theories, seem to take a life on their own. Most likely the “Dropa Stones” are Bi discs that for some reason were linked to a story about aliens and it went from there.

    Where is the corroboration? The caves these stones came from or the graves and bones of these 3-4 feet tall people? (pretty obviously “aliens”) How could these unknown hieroglyphs be translated? Where is this Austrian engineer and what does he have to say?

    Instead some people accept an otherwise fantastical story and add elements onto it, subjective and interpretive, and dismiss what doesn’t fit. Mention Roswell or the Bermuda Triangle or the Loch Ness Monster and up will come all kinds of theories about alternate dimensions and time travel and mutations from people who don’t know a thing about those topics yet fervently believe what they’re saying.

    This willingness to take these ideas and figuratively run with them explains a lot about conspiracy theories and bad science. Why a certain segment of the population seems ingrained to go with these stories I think is more interesting than the actual myths themselves.

  • Pingback: The 10 Most Not-So-Puzzling Ancient Artifacts: The Dropa Stones « Archaeology Fantasies

  • grub says:

    So where are these artifacts now?
    The conclusion of this article is that they don’t exist?

    • Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews says:

      No, if you read the article, you’ll see that there are some genuine discs associated with the Chinese Neolithic. They are known as Bi discs (see here for a summary) and there is absolutely nothing mysterious about them. They have been caught up in the fiction about the Dropa and ripped from their real archaeological context to spin the story along.

      If you look on auction sites, you’ll see plenty of Bi discs offered for sale. The discs are real: the story that they recount tales of alien exploration is fiction.

  • Jonathan Day says:

    First off, I would like to thank Keith for writing this piece. Archaeology is a fascinating subject and has plenty of real mystery without people having to invent more. In all fairness, it has not been helped by some of the more… …flamboyant… characters in archaeology in the early to middle history of the subject, or by some of the Victorian-era “methods”. Confusion over identity and loss of data are fertile soils for wild theories to grow.

    However, modern archaeologists and modern methods (assuming said archaeologists have a budget large enough to use them) are correcting a lot of earlier mistakes, misunderstandings and… well, they’re not really “urban legends” – “longbarrow legends” perhaps? This site is an excellent source of information for fixing this last category and hopefully it will continue to grow.

    (This is not to say I think modern archaeologists are perfect – the guys excavating Stonehenge a few years back earned themselves a mild scold from me on their discussion board for improper handling of samples they were going to carbon-date, for example – but mishandling a couple of samples is a B- at worst. Fictional accounts of a discovery that never was is an F.)

  • J.J. Vissers says:

    I think people who read comic books in the 1960s have a sort of “folk memory” about Dropa stones because they were featured in a widely-circulated Gold Key Comics series about UFOs and flying saucers. I still remember an illustration showing Eskimo-looking people pointing up at the sky at a fleet of space ships like lifting bodies with skids underneath. One of them is saying, “They come in gliders, just like we Dropas did, 10,000 years ago!” The following panel showed explorers finding a pile of thick, double-convex discs in a cave. I never read any “ancient astronaut” books, but when I saw the words “Dropa stones”, this instantly flashed to mind. Maybe other people my age half-remember it, too.

  • C.Hughes says:

    With so many discoveries out there that do not fit into the established timeline that archaeologists it has become difficult to decide who to believe. I’ve read books such as Forbidden Archaeology and chased down some of the references made in the book. Some were impossible to confirm,others left you wondering. In the end I guess it just comes down to opinions and everyone has one along with something else.

  • Konrad says:

    Check the place where China detonated their firs atomic bomb. QINGHAI province. Close, don’t u think ?

  • R. Allen says:

    Been reading through the site for a while now, I intend to read everything. Enjoying it so far.

    I’ve read this particular story many times on other sites, both for and against. I tend to agree with your conclusions here, but for the pure fun of it(and because conspiracy is funny to me), I would like to add: You couldn’t find records of a Tsum Um Nui, or a Chu Pu Tei? Or a Beijing Academy for Ancient Studies? How odd…brings back old memories of nutjob conspiracies about massive government coverups in the old U.S.S.R….

    Oh wait.

    • Jose Reyes says:

      This is great, I’m not a believer of the ancient astronaut theory, but I do enjoy watching and reading articles or shows about it its quite intriguing. It brings up questions on things that do seem out of place. I’ve recently read an article which I found in StumbleUpon that lead my to search for this Dropa Stones since it started throwing names and evidence I decide to do a search of it myself. I googled them found this site, and here I am. I do believe people tend believe anything anyone puts in books or shows without going research of their own. Kudos to this site and article very well done sir.

  • Pingback: The 10 Most Not-So-Puzzling Ancient Artifacts: The Dropa Stones,….. | Naavaay

  • Pingback: Don’t Dropa the Stone: Dropa Stones Debunked | Ancient Aliens Debunked

  • D. Lovejoy says:

    This is the way I look at it…….
    In order to be a true scientist of any real intelligence, then one must always keep an open mind to any potential “theory”. To be fair Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews, you don’t look old enough to have been a “professional” archaeologist for 26 years, and that is not an insult, just a mere observation. While I consider your hypothesis interesting, I must also remind you that unless you have concrete evidence to debunk anything, then it is still technically a “theory”. And don’t forget, at one time it was “theory” but considered fact that the Earth was flat and that the sun revolved around us instead of the other way around. I myself have studied Anthropology for almost 30 years and have realized that the only way we will ever know the truth on certain things is by inventing a time machine, and who knows, even the great Einstein has had some of his “theories” debunked recently. Just some food for thought…..

    • Fabio says:

      D. Lovejoy, how do you expect a debunking of an idea that has no traces in real life? Shouldn’t the burden of evidence lie on the claimants? I must remind you that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and this case doesn’t even have any. On the contrary, the fact that none of the people or institutions involved could be proven to exist only support the idea that this is a bad hoax. Of course no one can disprove this, just as you can’t disprove me when I say that there is a cat lying under my bed.

  • JAKESTER says:

    D Lovejoy, thank you for finally expressing some honest & personal thoughs. I dont usually believe what I hear or read, and nearly half of what I see. But one I couldnt miss was how much ass kissing your readers do! You should have Chapstick as a site sponser! Ok all jokes aside, these stones and their story do seem a little shady. But visitation by E.T.s in our distant past is a posibility. As any respected Astronomer or astrophysisist would tell you, the chances of another intellegent species to exist in this universe is not only a possibility, but a mathematical probability. If we advanced this far in thousands of years, what could we accomplish in millions? Id say things BEYOND our current imaginations! But i do enjoy sites based on factual study. So keep it up! And peace to all.

  • Tommy says:

    I am a Dropa. How dare people who haven’t met any of us insult our origin.

  • caryn says:

    You did a great job. Thanks.

  • leslie says:

    How I wish they would rid the History channel of those ufologists. They make up entire stories to fit their fantasies and will go to extreme lengths with their lies, what place does it have on a HISTORY channel?

    They are almost as bad as people like Mark Lehner & Zahi Hawass.

  • Pingback: The Mysterious Stone Tablets of Ancient China « The Sangha Kommune.

  • Claire Howdle says:

    Oh how i love a good debate!
    Got to say though neither of the ‘for or against’ arguments can be proven or dis-proven at this point as every bit of evidence and even the people involved at the time have vanished. It sounds pretty cool to have had an alien race crash land on earth, be hunted by and eventually inter-marry with the locals. It would be a good basis for a new Sci-Fi show……. but that’s all it is until there is more evidence.

    I should so copyright that idea :D

  • Andy C says:

    I speculate on this interesting subject: Perhaps the discs are maps of the universe, or rather maps of how time works in the universe with the hole in the middle representing the black hole at the center of the galaxy and the spirals depicting how time is displaced as you orbit closer or further away from the center. I think these hold far more information than has so far come to light.

    • McWaffle says:

      Hilarious. “These things I just heard of… I bet they are different than the way I just heard of them! I bet they mean something more than they did in the story I just heard!”

      Congratulations on your earth-shattering discovery, sir.

      Observe:

      To speculate on this interesting subject: Perhaps the disks are giant records. When you play the record backwards, you can hear it say “Paul is Dead”. I think these hold far more information than has so far come to light.

Leave a Reply